Last Sunday, I registered for an online chat (The Unexpected Party) hosted by Weta. It featured Peter Jackson (LOTR) and Guillermo del Toro discussing their latest project - The Hobbit Movie (in fact it appears that there will be two movies). The transcript for the session can be found on the Weta website. Unfortunately PJ and GDT were very vague about casting for the films mainly because they had not yet written the scripts. The prediction is that they will start filming in 2010, so there is plenty of time for consideration.
Call me old and naive - I had never realised until a few weeks ago that there was such a thing as internet bullying, cyberfights and flaming. I was aware that children are warned about inappropriate searches on the internet and about stalkers but not bullying. I recently did a quick search on the net on cyberbullying and came up with a few useful facts (mainly from school sites). Facts as follows from The Computer school.net internet safety tutorials:SAY NO TO CYBERBULLYING !!!!
Dr. Parry Aftab in his paper Kids Online in Schools: Risk Management and the Law proposes that there are four types of online bullies: 1. The Vengeful Angel 2. The Power-Hungry or revenge of the Nerds 3. The "Mean Girls" in which group he includes Malfoy from the Harry Potter books. 4. The Inadvertent Cyberbully or "Because I can". I inadvertently witnessed what I think was an example of Vengeful Angel behaviour on a messageboard quite recently which I found quite dreadful and can now understand why the school system has had to introduce strategies to protect pupils. This group however were adults and therefore cyberbullying is not necessarily confined to the middle school years as described in many articles on the subject. Dr Aftab describes the "Vengeful Angel" (in my recent experience I would call them "Avenging Angels") as follows:"Cyberbullying can occur through an Internet service such as e mail, chat rooms, discussion groups, instant messaging or web pages. Cyber bullying can include 1. Teasing and being made fun of 2. Spreading of false and hurtful rumours about people online 3. Sending unwanted messages 4. Racist or sexist attacks 5. Defamation Preventing cyber bullying 1. Always treat other people online the way you like to be treated. 2. If you are chatting in a chat room or by instant messenger, stop doing so if anyone says offensive things to you. Shut down the message or window and tell your parents about it straight away. 3. If somebody in a chat room is offensive to you, tell the chat room host or moderator. Trolls (I thought these were the things in LOTR or "3 Billy Goats Gruff"). A troll intentionally posts messages about sensitive topics constructed to cause controversy in an online community such as a forum. Trolls post on message boards. More recently they have been posting on blogs. Dealing with trolls People who run message boards and blogs always say "Do not feed the trolls". That means you should ignore what they write. Do not respond to them or attack them back. They are only trying to stir people up." (The Computer school.net internet safety tutorial)
”My reading states that if you are witnessing a case of flaming, cyberfighting or cyberbullying on a messageboard for example, you do not respond in kind but report the abuse to the administrators."In this type of cyberbullying, the cyberbully doesn’t see themselves as a bully at all. They see themselves as righting wrongs, or protecting themselves or others from the “bad guy” they are now victimizing. The “Vengeful Angel” cyberbully often gets involved trying to protect a friend who is being bullied or cyberbullied. They generally work alone, but may share their activities and motives with their close friends and others they perceive as being victimized by the person they are cyberbullying. Vengeful Angels need to know that no one should try and take justice into their own hands. They need to understand that few things are clear enough to understand, and that fighting bullying with more bullying only makes things worse. They need to see themselves as bullies, not the do-gooder they think they are." (Aftab, P. 2005. Kids Online in Schools).He goes on to say that their sense of injustice and reasons for bullying need to be addressed but that this should be done through official means.
Less than two weeks to go and my ability to think about my role as subdeacon is at an all time zero. I started some intercessions - there are a few formulae but you do have to have some inspiration in terms of wording. I had one practise with an empty chalice and managed to tilt it so just imagine with a full one! I've asked for a run through of steps/where we stand/bow etc with the head server next sunday and have to catch a time with the curate to run through with the chalice. I was told to be wary of administering the chalice to "tall blokes" as apparently you can misjudge where their mouths are....very funny, i don't think!!
Last night we were ushers at a local venue (I will not disclose the venue). A gentleman who was dishevelled and in what we perceived to be an acute psychotic state was seated at the back of this venue talking to himself loudly. He was not making a lot of sense and was using expressions that implied violence (I won't quote for fear of spam) to himself/property/others - it was difficult to understand him and he was unable to give us his name or contacts. We made the decision to call an ambulance as we felt that he needed medical/psychiatric attention. The ambulance sent two policemen instead. (I think this was an OH&S issue/mental health act policy - not sure). The gentleman decided he would move to the front of the venue thus coming into full view of a number of people. The police professionally and gently escorted him outside and then took him to a facility that could provide him with appropriate medical/psychiatric assistance. As ushers, we were approached by two people outraged by what we had done in terms of calling for assistance - they stated they would have been happy to have had the gentleman stay implying we should have been more tolerant. They clearly misunderstood that we had called the ambulance out of concern for the gentleman's condition and welfare of others should he become aggressive (implied by some of his speech). The irony was that only two people had bothered to speak to him, most people steered a very wide arc away from him. They therefore had no way of assessing the state of the gentleman's mental state and what the issues were.
The other irony was that at the end of the performance, the audience would have left leaving the workers at the venue to ask the gentleman to leave in order to lock up - where would he have gone in that state? To roam the streets at night exposing him to more harm to self or to others... who knows? If we had waited until the performance had ended and then called an ambulance (they probably still would have sent the police), would that have appeased the people who were outraged? We left the venue (and we are volunteers with no procedures to follow in these circumstances) feeling we were entirely in the wrong.
I should point out that we are in no way strangers to mental health issues having a close relative who has had first episode psychosis. I wonder if the attitude would have been different if the gentleman had been a younger person - would they have let a young person alone to fend for themselves or would assistance have been called? As a parent, I know what my preference would have been particularly if the child had been in such a state rendering them incapable of telling people their name and next of kin.